search Professional Ethics:                

 

Navigation


Topics

- Announcements
- Lectures
- Cases
- All Topics

Accounts

- Preferences
- User Info
- Edit User
- Messaging
- Change Password
- Logout

Discussions

- Active
- Older
- Past Polls
- Journals
- Messages
- Suggest New

Quick Links

- TAMUCC
- Bell Library
- Philosophy
- GEC

Section Change

Course Links


To be updated...

 

Review Quiz #7 (Natural Law Theory)

posted by Stefan Sencerz on Tuesday July 01, @09:37AM
from the Normative-Ethics dept.

Exam Review Exactly one answer to each question is best and thus correct. Clear and unambiguous answers have been provided during lectures. You can also find them in my outlines and reading related to those outlines, see especially:
The Natural Law Theory
Aquinas: Ethics and Natural Law


(Read More... | 10227 bytes in body | 1 comment)

Review Quiz #6 - The Divine Commands Theory

posted by Stefan Sencerz on Tuesday July 01, @09:06AM
from the Normative-Ethics dept.

Exam Review Exactly one answer to each question is best and thus correct. Clear and unambiguous answers have been provided during lectures. You can also find them in my outlines and reading related to those outlines, especially in The lecture outline for the Divine Command Theory
.


(Read More... | 9237 bytes in body)

Ethic and Religion I (The Divine Command Theory)

posted by Stefan Sencerz on Sunday June 29, @05:59PM
from the Ethical-Theory dept.

Lecture This week we will start discussing some conceptions of ethics that make morality dependent on religious assumptions. The first of these theories assumes that morality is simply a matter of God's commands. It is known as The Divine Command Theory . The second theory assumes, roughly, that morality is a matter of a certain Divine Plan or Design. It is known as the Natural Law Theory see see the last year outline

Readings:

Rachels, Chapter 4
Additional Readings:
Emil Brunner: The Divine Imperative
John Arthur: Morality Without God
Stefan Sencerz, "God and the Problem of Evil".
Stefan Sencerz, "Religion and Morality".


(Read More... | 11554 bytes in body)

Review Quiz #5 - Deontology and the Ethics of Respect for persons

posted by Stefan Sencerz on Wednesday June 25, @06:16PM
from the Normative-Ethics dept.

Exam Review If you decided to try to answer the question on line, please limit yourself to commenting on just one question at the time. I will not read any other answers. Also, see whether someone has already answered the question. There still can be room to explain why a certain answer is the correct one.
By the way, some of the questions deal wuth the concept of moral rights. You may find more information on this topic in my Outline on Moral Rights.


(Read More... | 15111 bytes in body | 1 comment)

Deontology and the Ethics of Respect for Persons

posted by Stefan Sencerz on Friday June 20, @11:51AM
from the Normative-Ethics dept.

Lecture In this lecture, we will introduce a few basic forms of deontology. Unlike various forms of consequentialism, deontological theories maintain that the moral status of action is not determined by consequences of this action. Rather, it is determined by the fact that the agent fulfilled (or failed to fulfill) his or her duty.

Readings: :

Rachels, Chapters 8 and 9
Kant, "The Categorical Imperative"


(Read More... | 26646 bytes in body | 1 comment)

Review Quiz #4 - Consequentialism, Utilitarianism,

posted by Stefan Sencerz on Wednesday June 18, @10:08AM
from the Normative-Ethics dept.

Exam Review Enclosed you will find several questions dealing with consequentialism, utilitarianism, and various accounts of intrinsic value. Feel free to discuss them with your peers and post what you think the correct answers are. Explain your answers. To eliminate redundancy, please review the answers already posted. You may add a reply to any of those answers.

For my benefit, and also for the benefit of other students, please address just one question in a post. (If you want to discuss more than one question make multiple posts.) It's beyond my power to review and comment on a post that gives answers to all (or even many) questions, especially when many folks make this sort of posts. Also, it's hard for others to discuss this sort of posts.

As always, save a copy of this quiz with answers for your file. Best of luck with this quiz.

Feel free to review also environmental ethics quiz (posted with the answers).


(Read More... | 12779 bytes in body)

The Outerbounds of Morality -- Enivironmental Ethics and Duties to Animals

posted by Stefan Sencerz on Tuesday June 17, @06:02AM
from the Applied-Ethics dept.

Lecture ENVIRONMENTAL ETHICS AND ANIMAL RIGHTS
The main point of this lecture is to explore the limits, or boundaries, of the sphere of moral concern. To do it, we will introduce a few basic views concerning environment and animal rights.

Required readings:

Peter Singer, "Equality for Animals?"
Tom Regan, "The Case for Animal Rights?".
Stefan Sencerz, "Ethics and Environment"
Additional Readings and Outlines:
An Animal's Place (The New York Times Magazine reporter Michael Pollan offers a critical discussion of Singer's position, then follows up with a much more moderate solution to the issues of "animal liberation") another link.
This Steer's Life, by Michael Pollan (with lots of good factual information).
Stefan Sencerz, Environmental Ethics Page (please notice extensive links at the bottom of that page).


(Read More... | 6739 bytes in body)

The Utilitarian Approach

posted by Stefan Sencerz on Tuesday June 17, @05:16AM
from the Normative-Ethics dept.

Lecture We start this lecture introducing the basic idea of consequentialism and contrasting this approach with non-consequentialist ethics. Subsequently, we explore a few basic kinds of consequentialism. The classical version of utilitarianism will be used to illustrate the main tenets of utilitarianism. Main objections to consequentialism will be discussed next.

Required readings:
Rachels, Chapters 6 an 7 ("The Utilitarian Approach" and "The Debate Over Utilitarianism")

Additional Readings and Outlines: Mill, "Utilitarianism"
How to work with the Matrix of Utility"
Sencerz, "Normative Ethics" (The Structure of Ethical Theory, Consequentialism, Objections to Utilitarianism)
Stefan Sencerz, "Intrinsic Value and Isolation Test"


(Read More... | 23970 bytes in body)

Review Quiz #3 - Egoism

posted by Stefan Sencerz on Monday June 16, @06:23PM
from the Normative-Ethics dept.

Exam Review Enclosed you will find several questions dealing with various versions of egoism. Feel free to discuss them with your peers and post the correct answers. Explain your answers. To eliminate redundancy, please review the answers already posted. You may add a reply to any of those answers.

For my benefit, and also for the benefit of other students, please address just one question in a post. (If you want to discuss more than one question make multiple posts.) It's beyond my power to review and comment on a post that gives answers to all (or even many) questions, especially when many folks make this sort of posts. Also, it's hard for others to discuss this sort of posts.

As always, save a copy of this quiz with your answers for your file. Best of luck with this quiz.


(Read More... | 7366 bytes in body)

Test #1 -- the post mortem review

posted by Stefan Sencerz on Saturday June 14, @01:11PM
from the Exams dept.

Exam Review Click on "read more" to see Test #1.


(Read More... | 13786 bytes in body)

 

[ home | contribute story | older articles | past polls | authors | preferences ]